Tooele County School District

Skip to main content
Main Menu Toggle

Bond 2019

Our Kids, Our Schools, Our Future
Thank you to those who supported the 2019 bond election. Although the results were disappointing, the need is still there. So, we will go out for another bond election in the future. In the meantime plans are being put in place to accommodate current and future growth. This may look like boundary changes, closed boundaries for 2020, purchasing additional portables with capital funds and year-round elementary schools. We will disseminate information as it is determined by the Board of Education. 
For questions or comments please email
Tooele County is the seventh fastest growing county in the United States, (according to the 2018 U.S. Census Bureau). With added residential growth comes a growth in student population. To continue meeting student needs, Tooele County School District will place a bond on the November 2019 General Election Ballot to fund new school construction and update existing schools with new security and safety features. 
PROJECTS BUTTON bond meeting schedule button Funding FAQ button
timeline button ballott button voter info button Bond Arguments button

Facts graphic

Myth 1: Funds from the bond will be used to increase wages for District Administrators.

Fact 1: Funds from the bonds can only be used for the projects outlined by the school board in the voter information pamphlet. The projects listed are one new high school, one new junior high school, one elementary school and security upgrades to existing schools.

Myth 2: Property taxes for a home valued at $250,000 will be $346 more per year not $128 as the school district says.

Fact 2: Although the ballot language first states the tax increase would be $346 per year for a home valued at $250,000, it further explains new bonds would be issued as old bonds are paid off. Thus, the increase is actually estimated to be $128 per year. As with all projections, there is a chance these numbers may change slightly and with the current tax rate, these are considered high estimates. The ballot language describing the higher tax amount is required per Utah code 11-14-206. The code mandates specific phrasing be used concerning property taxes without regard to outstanding bonds that will reduce over time.

Myth 3: Impact fees can be charged on new developments to generate funds for schools.

Fact 3: Utah Code 11-36a-206 titled "Prohibition of school impact fees" was implemented on March 21, 1995. It prevents any such fees from being collected for recouping the costs necessitated by and attributable to new developments. It would take a legislative act to change this law. 

Myth 4: New home owners should be the only ones charged for new schools needed due to growth.

Fact 4: Property taxes are not segregated between new homes versus old homes. They are only separated as to residential or business properties.

Myth 5: Building a bigger high school is a better option.

Fact 5: The cost to build a high school big enough to hold 4,000 students is nearly $225 million (125% more than the one being proposed). It would be more costly than the currently proposed high school, junior high, elementary school and security upgrades combined. The requested bond amount would need to be raised to $305 million. However, per the Utah Constitution Article XIV, Section 4-1-b “No city, town, school district, or other municipal corporation, may become indebted to an amount, including existing indebtedness, exceeding four per centum of the value of the taxable property therein.” The school district is not allowed to go into debt in an amount exceeding four percent of the taxable value of the county. A bigger high school would not only cost more for the taxpayer overall, it would also take longer to build due to how the bonds would need to be distributed in order to not exceed the four percent of the taxable value of the county. 

Myth 6: Portable classrooms could be used to house all the expected influx of students.

Fact 6: The maximum number of portables that can be placed on TCSD properties is 116. A total of 47 portable classrooms are already in use. It would take 100 more portables to house the 3,000 additional students expected in the next five years. However, only 69 more portables would fit, and some schools already have the maximum number of portables allowed on site. Some schools can’t have portables on-site at all due to the limited property area. Adding more portables is not always a viable solution.

Myth 7: The Tooele County School District doesn’t plan ahead

Fact 7: The District has a 10-year Master Facilities Capital Management Plan. Anticipating future growth is why funds from a 2015 school bond were used to purchase property for a new high school in the Overlake area of Tooele and a junior high in the Stansbury Park area. The existing 10-year plan ranges from 2014-2024. It considers enrollment projections, current district facilities, fiscal capacities, debts and more. The plan is consistently reviewed. Most of the projects in the 10-year plan have already been completed. The school district will start another 10-year plan once the three schools proposed in the 2019 Bond are complete.

Myth 8: The district is withholding itemized lists of the building costs.

Fact 8: The general budgets for the three proposed buildings are available online at specific details about building costs will not be available until after the bond is approved and construction bids come in.

Myth 9: There are only certain builders who can submit construction bids for the schools and/or the school district has already chosen a construction company without going out for a bid.

Fact 9: The school district has not taken any bids for the proposed bond projects. This will not occur until after a bond is approved. If the bond is approved, a Request for Proposal will be open to any company that wishes to bid on the project. The Utah Division of Purchasing and General Services is a public website where bidding occurs. Utah’s procurement process is found in the Utah Procurement Code (63G-6a- Utah Code Annotated). Specific rules governing procurement have been established by the Utah Procurement Policy Board and may be found within the Utah Administrative Code (Section R33).

Myth 10: Because the referendum is written in general terms, there is a “trojan horse” hiding in the midst.

Fact 10: According to Utah Code 53G-4-603, after the school board approves the bond resolution, they must specify in the voter information pamphlet the specific projects for which the bond is to be issued and they must ensure that the bond proceeds are used to complete projects in accordance with the plan stated in the voter information pamphlet, (the voter information pamphlet is located on the main page of the TCSD bond website and has been mailed out to registered voters). To change the plan of finance, the school board would hold a public hearing and must present compelling circumstances to adjust the plan. Changes to a bond plan can include adding or removing a project not previously listed, or changing the designation of a project's priority. The school board must approve the changes by two-thirds majority vote. If a local school board violates this a registered voter in the school district may file an action for an extraordinary writ to prohibit the local school board from adjusting the plan without obtaining the necessary local school board approval. If a registered voter prevails in an action the court shall award reasonable costs and attorney fees to the registered voter.